Acknowledgment

The manuscript should provide a list of all contributors who do not fit the requirements for authorship in the "Acknowledgments" section. They list the names of those people who provided technical aid, helped with scientific writing and manuscript preparation, provided material or financial support, and access/permissions support from department/institution heads, etc. It is important to recognize the organizations that offered financial assistance or other resources.

Changes in authorship

Changes pertaining to authorship (such as additions, deletions, name changes, or adjustments to contributions) require the approval of all authors after the work has been submitted. The editor will need written confirmation from the relevant author that all authors have given their agreement for the change in authorship if the modifications are appropriate and acceptable. In order to find out if the authors have approved of the change in authorship, the editor also has the right to get in touch with any or all of them. The modifications will be put into effect in compliance with COPE guidelines.

Conflicts of interest

When submitting work to an

It is the responsibility of the authors to declare all financial and non-financial competing interests, as well as financing and contributions.

Funding and Contributions

Regarding any and all financial contributions to the work being reported, each author is required to provide full and accurate disclosures. To maintain transparency throughout the review process, this information should be provided in the Funding statement found in the manuscript's Acknowledgments section. It will also be incorporated into the final publication. If applicable, non-monetary contributions of goods or services may be mentioned in the paper's published acknowledgments.

Among the competing financial interests are, but are not restricted to:

• Getting reimbursements, fees, funding, or honoraria from a company that stands to profit or lose money from the manuscript's publication now or in the future
• Owning stock or shares in a company that stands to profit or lose money now or in the future from the publication of the manuscript
• Having patents related to the content of the manuscript, or presently seeking for them

Non-financial competing interests

• Political, personal, religious, ideological, academic, and intellectual competing interests are examples of non-financial competing interests, though they are not the only ones.

Confidentiality

Manuscripts that are submitted are considered confidential. Only those involved in processing and preparing the manuscript for publication (if accepted) will be able to access submitted manuscripts, according to the

All information on the editing and peer review process for submitted manuscripts must be kept confidential by editors, authors, and reviewers. The peer review procedure is anonymous and confidential; reviewers' identities are kept private until specifically stated as part of open peer review. Manuscript confidentiality must be upheld by reviewers. Reviewers should understand that we take great care to maintain the anonymity of their identities and that it is our policy to do so. However, in circumstances where misconduct is suspected, a manuscript may be disclosed to the ethical committee of the

In cases of suspected research or publication misconduct, the

Originality and duplication of publication

Submissions to an

Plagiarism

Peer-review policy

Reviewers are essential to the publication of scientific works. The purpose of peer review is to make sure that journals publish high-quality research that benefits the whole scientific community.

Availability of data and materials

When an article is submitted to an

Wherever possible, we urge authors to make sure that their datasets are given in machine- readable format (such as spreadsheets instead of PDFs) and either uploaded to publicly accessible repositories or included in the primary publication or supplementary supporting files. Authors can contact the journal editorial office for more information on how to cite the source of data, and readers who are having trouble accessing or acquiring materials may get in touch with the office.

Misconduct

We take seriously any claims of misbehaviour related to research or publications. We will thoroughly look into any accusations, and we reserve the right to get in touch with the publishers, funders, or authorities in question if necessary. A transgression of the editorial policy, journal policies, publishing ethics, or any other relevant rules or regulations as stipulated by COPE and ICMJE is considered misconduct. Potential misconduct includes any further actions that jeopardize or undermine the integrity of the publication or research processes. Cases of suspected misbehaviour shall be looked upon in accordance with COPE guidelines.

Ethics and consent

A suitable ethics committee must have approved any research involving human subjects, human materials, human data, or animal experiments and it must have been carried out in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All manuscripts reporting such research must include a statement indicating this, together with the name of the ethics commission and the reference number, if applicable. The article should also include information on any exemptions from ethics approval that have been granted for the study (including the name of the ethics committee that made the exemption). If the editor determines that the research has not been conducted within a suitable ethical framework, the manuscript may be rejected. The Editor may, in exceptional circumstances, request more information from the ethics committee.

Self-archiving and license to publish

Manuscripts accepted for publication in the

Corrections and retractions

In rare instances, the